Debate Recap: Clear Winner?

Published: September 26, 2008, 11:04 pm ET
Bookmark and Share

Conservative Commentator

While Senator McCain made it clear that he wasn’t winning any awards for “Mr. Congeniality”, and he may need a new hire to pick out his ties, when the debate moved to foreign policy 45 minutes in, things finally got interesting. Initially the moderator, Lehrer, focused a large amount of time on the economy. Now while I see the merit in doing so, with such a great deal of national attention on the issue – this debate is supposed to be about foreign policy.

Personally, I feel that a 30 person audience reaction gauge at the bottom of CNN’s screen is a very small sample size, and is probably not giving the most accurate results, so lets ignore that for a second and move instead to what was said.

I must admit that I am impressed with Obama. He came to play and was able to take McCain toe to toe on some key foreign policy issues. He did his homework, even if it forced him to “agree with John” on some issues. McCain, on the other hand, clearly was able to use more precise language and details when explaining his positions, whether this be due to his superior level of experience and understanding or how he was briefed for the debate, he was effective and impressive – but he didn’t blow Obama away.

I’m going to say that round one was a tie – they held their ground and were informed. I’ll be interested to see if the candidates are able to generate more of a debate next time around. Bring on the VPs.

Related Stories
More Stories from The Collegian

Comments »

One Response to “Debate Recap: Clear Winner?”

  1. Darius Rasheed Nazeri on October 9th, 2008 12:44 pm

    Amy, I really like this post, however, I totally disagree that the first debate was a tie. Obviously, Obama outperformed McCain.

    Any while I agree that McCain has “superior experience” as measured in number of years, I doubt he has a better “understanding” of the issues or challenges we face in the Middle East.

    I have got to admit, I was impressed by his knowledge and understanding of affairs w. Russia and the Balkans, Ukraine, Georgia, etc. However, when it came to Iraq, Afghanistan and the Middle East, he seemed weaker.

    Check my article that shows more objective reasons for why Obama won the first debate: http://www.thecollegianur.com/2008/09/27/obama-1-mccain-0/

    Thanks.

Got something to say?

The Collegian welcomes on-topic discussion of its articles, opinion pieces and blog posts. Comments are moderated, but will not be censored or deleted based on political or ideological point of view. We reserve the right to remove comments that are tasteless, insensitive, irrelevant, use excessive inappropriate language, or are personal attacks or advertisements. Readers should be aware that comments and postings do not necessarily reflect the paper's views.